Research Integrity

Plagiarism Guidelines

IJPRMS is committed to protecting research originality and maintaining transparent, responsible and ethical scholarly publication practices.

Original Research

Every submission must represent the original scholarly work of its authors.

Our Plagiarism Policy

Commitment to Originality and Attribution

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Medical Sciences (IJPRMS) does not accept plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication or any other form of academic misconduct.

Authors must appropriately acknowledge all sources used in their manuscripts. Words, ideas, methods, data, tables, figures and other material obtained from existing publications must be accurately cited.

All manuscripts may be examined for similarity before or during the editorial and peer-review process. A similarity report is used as an editorial aid and is evaluated in the context of properly quoted, cited and unavoidable technical material.

Similarity Percentage Is Not the Only Decision Factor

Editorial decisions are not made solely on the basis of a numerical similarity percentage. Editors examine the nature, source, extent and context of matching material, including whether citations and quotations have been used correctly.

Unacceptable Practices

Forms of Plagiarism

Authors should understand and avoid all forms of unattributed or improperly reused scholarly content.

Direct Plagiarism

Copying another person’s words, sentences or paragraphs without quotation, acknowledgement or proper citation.

Self-Plagiarism

Reusing substantial parts of previously published work without disclosure, permission or appropriate citation.

Mosaic Plagiarism

Combining copied phrases or ideas from multiple sources while making only minor changes to the original material.

Improper Paraphrasing

Rewriting source material with limited changes while failing to acknowledge the original author or publication.

Data or Image Plagiarism

Using another researcher’s data, tables, graphs, figures or images without permission and appropriate attribution.

Idea Plagiarism

Presenting another person’s original idea, method, interpretation or research concept as one’s own work.

Editorial Procedure

Similarity Screening Process

01

Manuscript Submission

The author submits the complete manuscript and required declarations.

02

Similarity Screening

The manuscript may be examined for copied or substantially matching material.

03

Editorial Assessment

The editor evaluates the nature, context and seriousness of the identified similarities.

04

Editorial Decision

The manuscript may proceed, require correction or be rejected depending on the findings.

Policy Enforcement

Possible Editorial Actions

The response to plagiarism or duplicate publication depends on the nature and seriousness of the identified issue and the stage at which it is discovered.

1

Request for Clarification

Authors may be asked to explain matching material, provide original data or submit supporting documentation.

2

Manuscript Revision

Authors may be required to rewrite improperly paraphrased material and add missing citations or permissions.

3

Rejection Before Publication

A manuscript containing substantial plagiarism, duplicate publication or deliberate misconduct may be rejected.

4

Action After Publication

If serious plagiarism is discovered after publication, the journal may issue a correction, expression of concern or retraction as appropriate.

5

Institutional Notification

In cases of serious or repeated misconduct, the journal may communicate the matter to the author’s institution or relevant authority.

Author Responsibilities

Before submission, authors should verify that their manuscript properly acknowledges all sources and complies with the journal’s originality requirements.

  • All borrowed ideas, statements and data have been properly cited.
  • Direct quotations are clearly identified and referenced.
  • Previously published work by the authors has been disclosed and cited.
  • Tables, figures and images from other sources include attribution and permission where required.
  • The manuscript has not been submitted to another journal simultaneously.
  • All references cited in the text appear in the reference list.
  • The manuscript has been reviewed for accidental plagiarism before submission.
  • All listed authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Author Clarification or Appeal

Authors who believe that a plagiarism-related decision was based on incorrect information may submit a respectful written clarification with relevant supporting evidence to the editorial office.

Contact the Editorial Office

For questions regarding plagiarism screening, originality requirements or required corrections, contact the journal’s editorial office.