Direct Plagiarism
Copying another person’s words, sentences or paragraphs without quotation, acknowledgement or proper citation.
IJPRMS is committed to protecting research originality and maintaining transparent, responsible and ethical scholarly publication practices.
Every submission must represent the original scholarly work of its authors.
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Medical Sciences (IJPRMS) does not accept plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication or any other form of academic misconduct.
Authors must appropriately acknowledge all sources used in their manuscripts. Words, ideas, methods, data, tables, figures and other material obtained from existing publications must be accurately cited.
All manuscripts may be examined for similarity before or during the editorial and peer-review process. A similarity report is used as an editorial aid and is evaluated in the context of properly quoted, cited and unavoidable technical material.
Editorial decisions are not made solely on the basis of a numerical similarity percentage. Editors examine the nature, source, extent and context of matching material, including whether citations and quotations have been used correctly.
Authors should understand and avoid all forms of unattributed or improperly reused scholarly content.
Copying another person’s words, sentences or paragraphs without quotation, acknowledgement or proper citation.
Reusing substantial parts of previously published work without disclosure, permission or appropriate citation.
Combining copied phrases or ideas from multiple sources while making only minor changes to the original material.
Rewriting source material with limited changes while failing to acknowledge the original author or publication.
Using another researcher’s data, tables, graphs, figures or images without permission and appropriate attribution.
Presenting another person’s original idea, method, interpretation or research concept as one’s own work.
The author submits the complete manuscript and required declarations.
The manuscript may be examined for copied or substantially matching material.
The editor evaluates the nature, context and seriousness of the identified similarities.
The manuscript may proceed, require correction or be rejected depending on the findings.
The response to plagiarism or duplicate publication depends on the nature and seriousness of the identified issue and the stage at which it is discovered.
Authors may be asked to explain matching material, provide original data or submit supporting documentation.
Authors may be required to rewrite improperly paraphrased material and add missing citations or permissions.
A manuscript containing substantial plagiarism, duplicate publication or deliberate misconduct may be rejected.
If serious plagiarism is discovered after publication, the journal may issue a correction, expression of concern or retraction as appropriate.
In cases of serious or repeated misconduct, the journal may communicate the matter to the author’s institution or relevant authority.
Before submission, authors should verify that their manuscript properly acknowledges all sources and complies with the journal’s originality requirements.
Authors who believe that a plagiarism-related decision was based on incorrect information may submit a respectful written clarification with relevant supporting evidence to the editorial office.
For questions regarding plagiarism screening, originality requirements or required corrections, contact the journal’s editorial office.